Mr. Brittain (Photo: Twitter)

Craig Brittain, owner of the revenge porn hub Is Anybody Down, has borrowed a page from fellow revenge porn proprietor Hunter Moore.

Yesterday, in a tweet laden with remorse, Mr. Brittain announced that he is shutting down Is Anybody Down. After a number of self-pitying follow-ups on Twitter, he changed his bio to the rather emo, “Say good night to the bad guy.”

But, as we conjectured, it appears that Mr. Brittain was lying the whole time. On the same day that he announced he would be ending IAD, Mr. Brittain registered the domains ObamaNudes.com and ObamaNudes.net and transferred all of IAD's content over to them.

Getting Victims of Revenge Porn to Pay for Removing Images

On Is Anybody Down, Mr. Brittain offered a paid content removal service called "Takedown Hammer," which he claimed was run by an independent third party. However, investigations by the legal teams of the women suing him, as well as those by CBS News, revealed that Mr. Brittain and Takedown Hammer are one and the same. (Emails from both parties repeatedly come from the same I.P. address.)  ObamaNudes.com appears to be the same sort of racket, with a new ad to pay $300 for Takedown Hammer's services (up from $250).

In addition to the investigations conducted by CBS News in Denver, a Betabeat source posed as a victim of revenge porn and asked Takedown Hammer to remove her photos. The source embedded a code that tracked the IP addresses of where the emails were opened, and concluded that Mr. Brittain and the Takedown Hammer operate from the same location in Colorado Springs. The Daily Dot also reported something similar.

Why would Mr. Brittain start a whole new site after working so hard to establish Is Anybody Down? Perhaps because with the onslaught of news stories about him, IAD has landed him in a lot of hot water recently. Mr. Brittain may believe that by switching to a new domain, he can start fresh.

Hiring Men on PlentyofFish to Obtain Nude Images for the Site

A source alerted Betabeat to the fact that Mr. Brittain may have been actively hiring posters to obtain nude photos to populate Is Anybody Down. On September 21, 2012, an ad appeared on IAD for a "content acquisition specialist." The ad reads:

This is a commission-based position where you will be involved in the acquisition and submission of content to IAD as an independent contractor. No experience is necessary, we will train you. You must be 18+ and have valid identification information. Your information will be kept confidential. If you are or have ever been a member of law enforcement, any federal agency, etc. you are ineligible for this position and cannot contact us. For more information and to apply, please contact jobs@isanybodydown.com

One victim, who spoke to Betabeat under condition of anonymity, believes that this is how her photos ended up on IAD. She met a guy on PlentyofFish.com, whom she spoke to and hung out with for three weeks before he asked her to send him nude photos of herself.

"I of course wanted to make him happy, so sent him some topless pictures," the victim told Betabeat. "He ended things shortly after and on March 6th, almost a month after i sent him the pictures, my phone was beeping rapidly with new text messages all from numbers I didn't know." The photos that she had sent exclusively to the man she had been dating from Plenty of Fish had ended up on Is Anybody Down, and strangers who had seen her photos on the site began harassing her by calling both her cell phone and her work number.

"I answered the phone and a man was asking to speak to me and asked me if I knew there were nude pictures of me on a website called isanybodydown.com?" she continued. "I had just found out through all the texts messages and now men were calling my job looking for me. They asked my coworkers if I was attractive and if they wanted to see me naked."

The source believes that the man was hired by Is Anybody Down to court women and coax them into sending him naked photos. Once he obtained them, he abruptly ended the relationships and uploaded them to IAD.

The Legal Ramifications

Revenge porn hubs regularly invoke section 230 of in the Communications Decency Act, which states that website owners aren't responsible for user submitted content, to excuse their practices. But if IAD was paying posters to obtain nude photos from women and publish them to the site without their consent, Mr. Brittain may no longer be able to claim immunity under section 230.

Perhaps by switching to a new domain, Mr. Brittain believes he can escape potential legal consequences (one source told Betabeat a civil case is in the works against Mr. Brittain), but victims' rights advocates are hopeful that mounting media pressure will thrust him into the spotlight just enough to spur a police investigation.

"Perhaps Craig is going to pull the plug on IAD, but we certainly haven’t seen the last of Craig," said "Sarah," the anonymous woman behind victims' rights group End Revenge Porn. "As for the new domain that he created last night, Obamanudes.com, here’s hoping that it will draw the president’s attention to the issue of revenge porn!  Though I’m doubtful that it will, I’ll continue doing what I’m doing to bring awareness to this issue and to help its victims achieve justice."

A very "old" photo of Mr. Brittain.

Here at Betabeat, we've done some extensive reporting on the scourge of "revenge porn" websites, places where scorned exes or angry friends can upload intimate photos of women--and sometimes men--without their consent. Victims of revenge porn have been sexually and violently harassed, lost jobs and friends and even had to change their names because their photos ended up on one of the numerous revenge porn hubs.

Now, many women are bravely fighting back in a class action lawsuit against one site and its hosting provider, GoDaddy. Hackers, lawyers and activists are working diligently to confront a complex legal issue. Still, revenge porn sites continue to operate largely unaffected, despite the fact that more and more victims are speaking out about what happened to them.

“I call it entertainment,” Craig Brittain, the proprietor of Is Anybody Down, told CBS News earlier this week. “We don’t want anyone shamed or hurt, we just want the pictures there for entertainment purposes and business. I would say our business goal is to become big and profitable.”

Mr. Brittain also allegedly runs a service, Takedown Hammer, which charges $250 to remove the photos. He claimed Takedown Hammer is helmed by a New York-based lawyer named David Blade III, but several news outlets (including ours) have attempted to track him down and determined that no such person exists. Recently Mr. Brittain admitted Takedown Hammer is run by one of his friends.

In the post that we wrote about victims coming out against Is Anybody Down, Mr. Brittain himself took to our comments section. He did not defend his actions or seek to shed some light on just why he's decided to make a living ruining other people's lives. Instead, he took issue with the photo we had used of him, which he said was very old.

We find it rich that Mr. Brittain would take issue with the photo, given that he makes money publishing photos of others without their consent, right next to contact information and screencaps of their Facebook profiles. Mr. Brittain has said in interviews that his site helps desensitize people to intimate photos so that having naked pictures on the web won't hinder getting hired. To get so miffed by a clothed picture of yourself that you're compelled to leave a comment about it seems particularly laughable in comparison.

So, we'll swap out the old photo for a new one--if you pay our "friend" $250.