<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Betabeat &#187; site search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betabeat.com/tag/site-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betabeat.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='betabeat.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://betabeat.com/osd.xml" title="Betabeat" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://betabeat.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Can This Y Combinator Startup Solve the Site Search Problem?</title>

		<comments>http://betabeat.com/2012/05/can-this-y-combinator-startup-solve-the-site-search-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:56:19 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://betabeat.com/2012/05/can-this-y-combinator-startup-solve-the-site-search-problem/</link>
			<dc:creator>Jessica Roy</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betabeat.com/?p=44510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_44523" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 330px"><a href="http://swiftype.com/about"><img class=" wp-image-44523 " title="office-e7aee08c58a85875450b558c9bd94c0f" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/office-e7aee08c58a85875450b558c9bd94c0f.jpeg?w=400&h=265" alt="" width="320" height="212" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Swiftype&#039;s sweet offices. (swiftype.com)</p></div></p>
<p>Talk to anyone who primarily works on the Internet, and you'll eventually bump into the same grievance, no matter the industry: site search--the mechanism that allows users to search your website for key words--is broken. Actually, broken might be too soft a word: fucked is really more apt. On the whole, site search is fucked.</p>
<p>Last week we were at a bar with a fellow <em>Observer</em> staff writer, when the conversation turned to site search. "I abandoned my Tumblr because their site search doesn't work," he declared. We all nodded our heads in agreement.</p>
<p>But it's not just Tumblr. Have you ever tried to search this very website?</p>
<p><!--more-->The most effective searchers abandon a site's search box in lieu of a defined Google query, but even Google's site search <a href="http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/products_gss.html">products</a> aren't particularly reliable. It's a frustrating reality for anyone who publishes online, and it also relegates any content published before a certain time period to the bowels of the Internet. No one is going to unearth a story you wrote six months ago, no matter how relevant to your search query it is.</p>
<p>So when we came upon this <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/05/08/swiftype-launch/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29">post</a> on TechCrunch about Y Combinator-backed startup <a href="http://swiftype.com/">Swiftype</a>, a project from two ex-Scribd employees, we gleefully Skyped it to the other Betabeat staffers. "If this really works as well as it says it does, we NEED it," we typed.</p>
<p>And it's true: On the surface, Swiftype--which purports to add "great search to your website in minutes"--looks very much like the answer to our Internet-borne prayers. Its founders, Matt Riley and Quin Hoxie, told TechCrunch that Swiftype indexes a more comprehensive crawl than even Google site search does, making "a PageRank that’s specific to individual websites."</p>
<p>But this is where it gets even better: unlike Google, Swiftype allows you to control which pages display at the top of the results when a user searches a specific word. That means that if you're a blog like Betabeat, when someone searches "Apple," for example, the site administrator can choose which articles are the most relevant, and rank them thusly. It's really an editor's dream: complete control of your search results. We're kind of freaking out just thinking about it.</p>
<p>Swiftype just launched its public beta today, so it remains to be seen if it will actually live up to its exciting claims. We tried it out and found it a little bit buggy--when we created a search engine, it didn't index our pages like it does in the video, and when we tried to delete it, it refused to respond to our command.</p>
<p>Obviously the Swiftype team still has a few bugs to work out, but you should probably test it out for free before it exits beta and implements a <a href="http://swiftype.com/pricing">pricing</a> model.</p>
<p><center><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pITuOcGgpBs" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></center></p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_44523" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 330px"><a href="http://swiftype.com/about"><img class=" wp-image-44523 " title="office-e7aee08c58a85875450b558c9bd94c0f" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/office-e7aee08c58a85875450b558c9bd94c0f.jpeg?w=400&h=265" alt="" width="320" height="212" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Swiftype&#039;s sweet offices. (swiftype.com)</p></div></p>
<p>Talk to anyone who primarily works on the Internet, and you'll eventually bump into the same grievance, no matter the industry: site search--the mechanism that allows users to search your website for key words--is broken. Actually, broken might be too soft a word: fucked is really more apt. On the whole, site search is fucked.</p>
<p>Last week we were at a bar with a fellow <em>Observer</em> staff writer, when the conversation turned to site search. "I abandoned my Tumblr because their site search doesn't work," he declared. We all nodded our heads in agreement.</p>
<p>But it's not just Tumblr. Have you ever tried to search this very website?</p>
<p><!--more-->The most effective searchers abandon a site's search box in lieu of a defined Google query, but even Google's site search <a href="http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/products_gss.html">products</a> aren't particularly reliable. It's a frustrating reality for anyone who publishes online, and it also relegates any content published before a certain time period to the bowels of the Internet. No one is going to unearth a story you wrote six months ago, no matter how relevant to your search query it is.</p>
<p>So when we came upon this <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/05/08/swiftype-launch/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29">post</a> on TechCrunch about Y Combinator-backed startup <a href="http://swiftype.com/">Swiftype</a>, a project from two ex-Scribd employees, we gleefully Skyped it to the other Betabeat staffers. "If this really works as well as it says it does, we NEED it," we typed.</p>
<p>And it's true: On the surface, Swiftype--which purports to add "great search to your website in minutes"--looks very much like the answer to our Internet-borne prayers. Its founders, Matt Riley and Quin Hoxie, told TechCrunch that Swiftype indexes a more comprehensive crawl than even Google site search does, making "a PageRank that’s specific to individual websites."</p>
<p>But this is where it gets even better: unlike Google, Swiftype allows you to control which pages display at the top of the results when a user searches a specific word. That means that if you're a blog like Betabeat, when someone searches "Apple," for example, the site administrator can choose which articles are the most relevant, and rank them thusly. It's really an editor's dream: complete control of your search results. We're kind of freaking out just thinking about it.</p>
<p>Swiftype just launched its public beta today, so it remains to be seen if it will actually live up to its exciting claims. We tried it out and found it a little bit buggy--when we created a search engine, it didn't index our pages like it does in the video, and when we tried to delete it, it refused to respond to our command.</p>
<p>Obviously the Swiftype team still has a few bugs to work out, but you should probably test it out for free before it exits beta and implements a <a href="http://swiftype.com/pricing">pricing</a> model.</p>
<p><center><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pITuOcGgpBs" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://betabeat.com/2012/05/can-this-y-combinator-startup-solve-the-site-search-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/office-e7aee08c58a85875450b558c9bd94c0f.jpeg?w=400&#38;h=265" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">office-e7aee08c58a85875450b558c9bd94c0f</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
