<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Betabeat &#187; Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betabeat.com/tag/results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betabeat.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:58:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='betabeat.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://betabeat.com/osd.xml" title="Betabeat" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://betabeat.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>SecondMarket Q3 Private Market Results: Soundin&#8217; Kinda Tertiary, Dawg</title>

		<comments>http://betabeat.com/2011/10/secondmarket-q3-private-market-results-soundin-kinda-tertiary-dawg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:32:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://betabeat.com/2011/10/secondmarket-q3-private-market-results-soundin-kinda-tertiary-dawg/</link>
			<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betabeat.com/?p=20202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-20230" title="secondmarket_homepage" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/secondmarket_homepage.jpg?w=300&h=205" alt="" width="300" height="205" />The startup built to help normal folks like you and me  (who happen to have <a href="http://www.sec.gov/answers/accred.htm">$1M laying around and/or made over $200K</a> in the last two years) can trade in private companies like Facebook and Twitter has released their third quarter private market results for 2011! What does <a href="http://www.secondmarket.com" target="_blank">SecondMarket</a> have behind Door Number Q3! <strong>(UPDATED)</strong><!--more--></p>
<p>Refresher:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.betabeat.com/2011/04/27/secondmarket-userbase-grew-152-over-last-six-months/">Q1</a>: SecondMarket <a href="https://www.secondmarket.com/discover/reports/q1-2011-private-company-report">reports</a> $115.4M in transactions, a <strong>52% quarter-on-quarter increase</strong>, 152 percent over the six months prior. Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-27/facebook-drives-secondmarket-broking-1-billion-private-shares.html">puts them on track</a> to move over $1B through the company in 2011.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.betabeat.com/2011/07/26/two-of-secondmarkets-most-watched-companies-are-from-new-york/">Q2</a>: SecondMarket posts a total of $268M in 2011 so far. Not too close to that $1B in 2011, but the good news is that they now report their 1Q as having been <a href="https://www.secondmarket.com/discover/reports/q2-2011-private-company-report#transactions">$156M instead of the originally reported $115.4M</a>. How'd they lose track of the $40.6M? Beats us! While touting their totals, they fail to put the full Q2 take at the top: $112M, <strike>a 32.2% quarter-on-quarter increase</strike> <strong>a 28.2% decrease in trading volume</strong>, not quite the 52% meteoric growth their Q1 report clocked in—but they touted their 75% year-over-year.</p>
<p>And today?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.secondmarket.com/discover/reports/q3-2011-private-company-report" target="_blank">Q3</a>: $167M in transactions, putting them year-to-date at $435M. This leaves them a solid three months to cover a pithy $565M and meet that $1B in 2011 mark. Math!</p>
<p>They're touting a 75% year-to-year uptick, which you'll notice they also did in Q2, but they are not touting—take a guess—their <strike>9.4% quarter-to-quarter increase</strike> <strong>49% quarter-to-quarter increase in trading volume</strong>. But there's something missing from this, because:</p>
<p>SecondMarket's quarter-to-quarter trading volume <strike>is dropping like a ball in a Mets outfielder's glove</strike> is still <strong>only up 7% from Q1</strong>, which is not entirely like a fly ball in CitiField, but isn't exactly a double, either. That's a 49% quarter-to-quarter increase on a quarter in which they were <em>down 28.2%</em>. That may have something to do with <a href="http://uncrunched.com/2011/10/22/another-failed-facebook-auction-at-secondmarket/">falling short</a> on their <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-27/facebook-drives-secondmarket-broking-1-billion-private-shares.html">much-hyped potential</a> to broker Facebook shares. </p>
<p>Also, <a href="https://www.secondmarket.com/discover/reports/q3-2011-business-update">earlier this month</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>SecondMarket exceeded the 75,000 participant mark, with more than 7,000 individuals and institutions signing up in the third quarter. This represents nearly a 10% increase quarter-on-quarter and 333% increase since Q3 2010.</p></blockquote>
<p>That sounds nice! But means nothing. Why?</p>
<p>Because you don't need to have a million dollars to sign up for it. You can be as broke as us and put SecondMarket companies on your "Watch List!" [Kind of like signing up on foursquare just to avoid people you hate, by "friending" them and not checking in anywhere.]</p>
<p>Speaking of foursquare, elsewhere in their Q3 report, we learn that foursquare and Gilt Groupe remain in the most watched companies on SecondMarket, though their positions on that list (#5 and #9, respectively) are unchanged. In the "Rising Stars" section, New York-based Turntable.FM saw a 500% uptick in "Watchers." Also on that list are Jetsetter, KickStarter, and ZocDoc: all New York companies!</p>
<p>This would be nice if that number mattered in the least.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-20221" title="Rising Stars Q3 SecondMarket" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/risingstars-e1319651886377.png" alt="" width="600" height="424" /></p>
<p>500%! 66 Watchers! That means that Turntable.FM started out with 11 Watchers in Q2, and picked up 55 "Watchers" in those three months. Meanwhile, ZocDoc climbed a sad 142% to 63 Watchers, which means they picked up 37 Watchers from Q2. The difference in SecondMarket's "Rising Stars" are 18 people clicking the "Watch" button, which warrants the question: WHO WILL WATCH THE WATCHERS?</p>
<p>In short:</p>
<ul>
<li>SecondMarket's Q3 results look downright tertiary compared with their Q1 boasts.</li>
<li>They're going to fall short of the $1B in trading volume Bloomberg pegged them hitting in 2011 at the beginning of the year.</li>
<li>The statistics about "Watchers" mean very little.</li>
<li>But hey, have you heard about <a href="http://www.betabeat.com/tags/turntable-fm/" target="_blank">this Turntable.FM thing</a>?</li>
<li>Finally, if Facebook would stop being such bummers and let SecondMarket move their stock, life would be way cooler.</li>
</ul>
<p>Also, they'd be <a href="http://www.betabeat.com/2011/06/24/wall-street-investment-firm-sues-secondmarket-over-2-4-million-in-facebook-shares/" target="_blank">sued by people who don't really understand</a> their role in trading on secondary markets a lot less. Which helps.</p>
<p><strong>CORRECTION</strong>: Our math originally reflected the Q1 report released by SecondMarket in May; we missed the footnote on their Q2 report correcting their first quarter's results by <em><a href="https://www.secondmarket.com/discover/reports/q2-2011-private-company-report#transactions">$40.6M</a></em>. So it looks like <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/26/private-stock-transactions-up-73-percent-this-year-on-secondmarket/">TechCrunch's math was right</a>, even if they didn't report the loss in the second quarter, which takes some of the shine off of Q3. Finally, Bloomberg were the ones <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-27/facebook-drives-secondmarket-broking-1-billion-private-shares.html">to put SecondMarket on track for $1B in 2011</a>. We regret the error.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-20230" title="secondmarket_homepage" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/secondmarket_homepage.jpg?w=300&h=205" alt="" width="300" height="205" />The startup built to help normal folks like you and me  (who happen to have <a href="http://www.sec.gov/answers/accred.htm">$1M laying around and/or made over $200K</a> in the last two years) can trade in private companies like Facebook and Twitter has released their third quarter private market results for 2011! What does <a href="http://www.secondmarket.com" target="_blank">SecondMarket</a> have behind Door Number Q3! <strong>(UPDATED)</strong><!--more--></p>
<p>Refresher:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.betabeat.com/2011/04/27/secondmarket-userbase-grew-152-over-last-six-months/">Q1</a>: SecondMarket <a href="https://www.secondmarket.com/discover/reports/q1-2011-private-company-report">reports</a> $115.4M in transactions, a <strong>52% quarter-on-quarter increase</strong>, 152 percent over the six months prior. Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-27/facebook-drives-secondmarket-broking-1-billion-private-shares.html">puts them on track</a> to move over $1B through the company in 2011.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.betabeat.com/2011/07/26/two-of-secondmarkets-most-watched-companies-are-from-new-york/">Q2</a>: SecondMarket posts a total of $268M in 2011 so far. Not too close to that $1B in 2011, but the good news is that they now report their 1Q as having been <a href="https://www.secondmarket.com/discover/reports/q2-2011-private-company-report#transactions">$156M instead of the originally reported $115.4M</a>. How'd they lose track of the $40.6M? Beats us! While touting their totals, they fail to put the full Q2 take at the top: $112M, <strike>a 32.2% quarter-on-quarter increase</strike> <strong>a 28.2% decrease in trading volume</strong>, not quite the 52% meteoric growth their Q1 report clocked in—but they touted their 75% year-over-year.</p>
<p>And today?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.secondmarket.com/discover/reports/q3-2011-private-company-report" target="_blank">Q3</a>: $167M in transactions, putting them year-to-date at $435M. This leaves them a solid three months to cover a pithy $565M and meet that $1B in 2011 mark. Math!</p>
<p>They're touting a 75% year-to-year uptick, which you'll notice they also did in Q2, but they are not touting—take a guess—their <strike>9.4% quarter-to-quarter increase</strike> <strong>49% quarter-to-quarter increase in trading volume</strong>. But there's something missing from this, because:</p>
<p>SecondMarket's quarter-to-quarter trading volume <strike>is dropping like a ball in a Mets outfielder's glove</strike> is still <strong>only up 7% from Q1</strong>, which is not entirely like a fly ball in CitiField, but isn't exactly a double, either. That's a 49% quarter-to-quarter increase on a quarter in which they were <em>down 28.2%</em>. That may have something to do with <a href="http://uncrunched.com/2011/10/22/another-failed-facebook-auction-at-secondmarket/">falling short</a> on their <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-27/facebook-drives-secondmarket-broking-1-billion-private-shares.html">much-hyped potential</a> to broker Facebook shares. </p>
<p>Also, <a href="https://www.secondmarket.com/discover/reports/q3-2011-business-update">earlier this month</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>SecondMarket exceeded the 75,000 participant mark, with more than 7,000 individuals and institutions signing up in the third quarter. This represents nearly a 10% increase quarter-on-quarter and 333% increase since Q3 2010.</p></blockquote>
<p>That sounds nice! But means nothing. Why?</p>
<p>Because you don't need to have a million dollars to sign up for it. You can be as broke as us and put SecondMarket companies on your "Watch List!" [Kind of like signing up on foursquare just to avoid people you hate, by "friending" them and not checking in anywhere.]</p>
<p>Speaking of foursquare, elsewhere in their Q3 report, we learn that foursquare and Gilt Groupe remain in the most watched companies on SecondMarket, though their positions on that list (#5 and #9, respectively) are unchanged. In the "Rising Stars" section, New York-based Turntable.FM saw a 500% uptick in "Watchers." Also on that list are Jetsetter, KickStarter, and ZocDoc: all New York companies!</p>
<p>This would be nice if that number mattered in the least.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-20221" title="Rising Stars Q3 SecondMarket" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/risingstars-e1319651886377.png" alt="" width="600" height="424" /></p>
<p>500%! 66 Watchers! That means that Turntable.FM started out with 11 Watchers in Q2, and picked up 55 "Watchers" in those three months. Meanwhile, ZocDoc climbed a sad 142% to 63 Watchers, which means they picked up 37 Watchers from Q2. The difference in SecondMarket's "Rising Stars" are 18 people clicking the "Watch" button, which warrants the question: WHO WILL WATCH THE WATCHERS?</p>
<p>In short:</p>
<ul>
<li>SecondMarket's Q3 results look downright tertiary compared with their Q1 boasts.</li>
<li>They're going to fall short of the $1B in trading volume Bloomberg pegged them hitting in 2011 at the beginning of the year.</li>
<li>The statistics about "Watchers" mean very little.</li>
<li>But hey, have you heard about <a href="http://www.betabeat.com/tags/turntable-fm/" target="_blank">this Turntable.FM thing</a>?</li>
<li>Finally, if Facebook would stop being such bummers and let SecondMarket move their stock, life would be way cooler.</li>
</ul>
<p>Also, they'd be <a href="http://www.betabeat.com/2011/06/24/wall-street-investment-firm-sues-secondmarket-over-2-4-million-in-facebook-shares/" target="_blank">sued by people who don't really understand</a> their role in trading on secondary markets a lot less. Which helps.</p>
<p><strong>CORRECTION</strong>: Our math originally reflected the Q1 report released by SecondMarket in May; we missed the footnote on their Q2 report correcting their first quarter's results by <em><a href="https://www.secondmarket.com/discover/reports/q2-2011-private-company-report#transactions">$40.6M</a></em>. So it looks like <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/26/private-stock-transactions-up-73-percent-this-year-on-secondmarket/">TechCrunch's math was right</a>, even if they didn't report the loss in the second quarter, which takes some of the shine off of Q3. Finally, Bloomberg were the ones <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-27/facebook-drives-secondmarket-broking-1-billion-private-shares.html">to put SecondMarket on track for $1B in 2011</a>. We regret the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://betabeat.com/2011/10/secondmarket-q3-private-market-results-soundin-kinda-tertiary-dawg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/secondmarket_homepage.jpg?w=300&#38;h=205" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">secondmarket_homepage</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/risingstars-e1319651886377.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Rising Stars Q3 SecondMarket</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
