<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Betabeat &#187; Patrick Leahy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betabeat.com/tag/patrick-leahy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betabeat.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:27:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='betabeat.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://betabeat.com/osd.xml" title="Betabeat" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://betabeat.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Drones Are Basically a Rorschach Test: Creepy or Cool?</title>

		<comments>http://betabeat.com/2013/03/drones-senate-hearings-patrick-leahy-diane-feinstein-privacy-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:15:02 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://betabeat.com/2013/03/drones-senate-hearings-patrick-leahy-diane-feinstein-privacy-laws/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kelly Faircloth</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betabeat.com/?p=82528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_64450" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 268px"><a href="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_1409.jpg"><img class=" wp-image-64450   " alt="An EPA drone. Trash burners, be worried. " src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_1409.jpg" width="258" height="194" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">An EPA drone. Trash burners, be worried.</p></div></p>
<p>Yesterday the Senate held <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/21/us/politics/senate-panel-weighs-privacy-concerns-over-use-of-drones.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;_r=0">a hearing on drones</a>, to discuss whether privacy laws can handle a sudden proliferation of cheap, lightweight aircraft perfectly designed for unlawful surveillance. Can the cops now hover over your carefully hidden pot crop? Can the sex offender down the street now peek into your second-story window? How are corporations going to use this to their advantage?</p>
<p>The only comforting sight was the image of charming grandparents Patrick Leahy and Diane Feinstein <a href="http://www.trbimg.com/img-514a499e/turbine/la-apphoto-drones-jpg-20130320/600">investigating</a> one of these newfangled devices.</p>
<p>As the <em>New York Times </em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/21/us/politics/senate-panel-weighs-privacy-concerns-over-use-of-drones.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;_r=0">reports</a>, the meeting was also an occasion to air two very, very different viewpoints on the new gadgets: Are they spiffy D.I.Y. gizmos, or are they an Orwellian threat to privacy?</p>
<blockquote><p>Showing the public uneasiness over the new technology, one young protester at the hearing was led away by Capitol police after she stood up and declared, “Drones are responsible for the death of people in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia and Yemen!” Another protester held a sign that said, “1984.”</p>
<p>As Ms. Goitein observed, “The country can be divided into people who think this is horrifying and people who think this is neat.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, could we get a diagram mapping how <a href="http://www.esquire.com/blogs/culture/Silicon_Valley_Handshake_Protocol">Hacker News commenters</a> break out into those two populations? Much appreciated.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_64450" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 268px"><a href="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_1409.jpg"><img class=" wp-image-64450   " alt="An EPA drone. Trash burners, be worried. " src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_1409.jpg" width="258" height="194" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">An EPA drone. Trash burners, be worried.</p></div></p>
<p>Yesterday the Senate held <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/21/us/politics/senate-panel-weighs-privacy-concerns-over-use-of-drones.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;_r=0">a hearing on drones</a>, to discuss whether privacy laws can handle a sudden proliferation of cheap, lightweight aircraft perfectly designed for unlawful surveillance. Can the cops now hover over your carefully hidden pot crop? Can the sex offender down the street now peek into your second-story window? How are corporations going to use this to their advantage?</p>
<p>The only comforting sight was the image of charming grandparents Patrick Leahy and Diane Feinstein <a href="http://www.trbimg.com/img-514a499e/turbine/la-apphoto-drones-jpg-20130320/600">investigating</a> one of these newfangled devices.</p>
<p>As the <em>New York Times </em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/21/us/politics/senate-panel-weighs-privacy-concerns-over-use-of-drones.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;_r=0">reports</a>, the meeting was also an occasion to air two very, very different viewpoints on the new gadgets: Are they spiffy D.I.Y. gizmos, or are they an Orwellian threat to privacy?</p>
<blockquote><p>Showing the public uneasiness over the new technology, one young protester at the hearing was led away by Capitol police after she stood up and declared, “Drones are responsible for the death of people in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia and Yemen!” Another protester held a sign that said, “1984.”</p>
<p>As Ms. Goitein observed, “The country can be divided into people who think this is horrifying and people who think this is neat.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, could we get a diagram mapping how <a href="http://www.esquire.com/blogs/culture/Silicon_Valley_Handshake_Protocol">Hacker News commenters</a> break out into those two populations? Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://betabeat.com/2013/03/drones-senate-hearings-patrick-leahy-diane-feinstein-privacy-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_1409.jpg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_1409.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">The EPA brought a drone</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/0bbc75db8f7be0cab7d4698c7cd08df2?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kfairclothobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/img_1409.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">An EPA drone. Trash burners, be worried. </media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Gmail, Facebook Messages Inch Toward Legal Protection</title>

		<comments>http://betabeat.com/2012/09/patrick-leahy-gmail-committee-warrant-legal-protection-adopted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:48:40 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://betabeat.com/2012/09/patrick-leahy-gmail-committee-warrant-legal-protection-adopted/</link>
			<dc:creator>Kelly Faircloth</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betabeat.com/?p=63286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_63301" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/bd.jpeg"><img class=" wp-image-63301 " title="bd" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/bd.jpeg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="167" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">"How many times have I told you? <em>Always call from an outside line!</em>"</p></div></p>
<p>Those of you with a history of sketchy dealings lurking in your Facebook messages and/or Gmail archives are one step closer to search-and-seizure protection.</p>
<p><a href="http://betabeat.com/2012/09/good-news-for-everyone-with-embarrassing-gchat-logs-cops-may-soon-need-a-warrant-to-read-your-gmail/">Last week</a>, Senator Patrick Leahy introduced an amendment that would require the cops to show up with a warrant if they want access to personal data stored in the cloud. And earlier today, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/250683-senate-moves-ahead-with-warrant-requirement-for-email-snooping">reports <em>The Hill</em></a>, that amendment was officially adopted by the Senate Judiciary Committee.</p>
<p>But don't open up a Gchat conversation with your weed dealer just yet.<!--more--></p>
<p>The committee's adoption is an important hurdle, but the amendment has a long way to go before figuring into any <em>Law and Order: SVU </em>episodes. The change isn't contained within its own legislation. It's tucked into a House bill regarding video privacy. The Senate Judiciary Committee just approved including the amendment within the bill, and now it has to approve that bill before it can even be debated on the floor by the full Senate, much less be adopted.</p>
<p>So maybe just stick to using disposable cell phones and payphones for all your shady shit.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_63301" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/bd.jpeg"><img class=" wp-image-63301 " title="bd" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/bd.jpeg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="167" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">"How many times have I told you? <em>Always call from an outside line!</em>"</p></div></p>
<p>Those of you with a history of sketchy dealings lurking in your Facebook messages and/or Gmail archives are one step closer to search-and-seizure protection.</p>
<p><a href="http://betabeat.com/2012/09/good-news-for-everyone-with-embarrassing-gchat-logs-cops-may-soon-need-a-warrant-to-read-your-gmail/">Last week</a>, Senator Patrick Leahy introduced an amendment that would require the cops to show up with a warrant if they want access to personal data stored in the cloud. And earlier today, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/250683-senate-moves-ahead-with-warrant-requirement-for-email-snooping">reports <em>The Hill</em></a>, that amendment was officially adopted by the Senate Judiciary Committee.</p>
<p>But don't open up a Gchat conversation with your weed dealer just yet.<!--more--></p>
<p>The committee's adoption is an important hurdle, but the amendment has a long way to go before figuring into any <em>Law and Order: SVU </em>episodes. The change isn't contained within its own legislation. It's tucked into a House bill regarding video privacy. The Senate Judiciary Committee just approved including the amendment within the bill, and now it has to approve that bill before it can even be debated on the floor by the full Senate, much less be adopted.</p>
<p>So maybe just stick to using disposable cell phones and payphones for all your shady shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://betabeat.com/2012/09/patrick-leahy-gmail-committee-warrant-legal-protection-adopted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/0bbc75db8f7be0cab7d4698c7cd08df2?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kfairclothobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/bd.jpeg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bd</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
