'Murica! (Photo: Google)

Hey America, don't say Google never did anything for you: Looks like Google Glass will be made right here in the good old U. S. of A. That's according to the Financial Times says, citing sources "familiar with the company's plans."

The president's speechwriters have likely already popped this news into the Google Doc where they spitball ideas for the next State of the Union.

The FT says Google is talking to Foxconn about manufacturing components elsewhere in the world then assembling the final product in Santa Clara. It's not clear how many jobs such a facility might create. According to the report:

The small scale, high cost and complexity of the project’s initial run makes it practical to base manufacturing operations near the search company’s Silicon Valley headquarters, according to people briefed on the plans.

Proximity to Google HQ means it'll be easier for Sergey and his minions to keep a close cybernetic eye on production, in case problems crop up.

Newt's going to be so stoked, you guys.

The crowded presser for the factory of the future. (Photo: Shapways' Instagram)

This morning, Betabeat ventured forth to the industrial environs of Long Island City for a ribbon-cutting at what's being billed as the "factory of the future."

Naturally, quite a few tech scene regulars were in attendance, like New York City Economic Development Corporation president Seth Pinsky. But, by and large, it was mayor Michael Bloomberg's show--that, and of course Shapeways, the company that'll soon be 3D printing user-generated designs right were we were standing.

"There are plenty of good reasons we want New York City to be the epicenter of the industry, something, folks, that the factory and the research lab here at Shapeways will help make possible," he told us, before adding, for anyone missing the point: "This is the future of our city."

"We have to compete with other cities around the world, and I think we are well on our way to do it, but we certainly cannot let up."

Shapeways, which also has offices in Seattle and the Netherlands, got its start abroad but has been headquartered in New York since 2010. However, this is the company's first production facility here in the city. Once it's up and running, the factory will hold fifty industrial-scale printers, capable of producing 5 million products a year. It'll also contain a research lab, devoted to advancing the technology.

At 25,000 square feet, it'll be the biggest 3D printing facility (for individual consumers, that is) in the world.

However, when we arrived, all we saw was an enormous empty space--the kind of echoey void that makes you want to strap on a pair of 3D rollerskates. In one corner of the room, everyone had gathered around the pastries and coffee dispensers (provided by Joyride, of course); in another, someone had set up a podium, a cluster of chairs, and a table covered in 3D-printed tchotchkes. Chief Digital Officer Rachel Haot was already floating through the crowd, meeting and greeting, and we saw Queens Tech Meetup ringleader Jukay Hsu roll up with a cup of something warm in hand. A commercial on infinite loop was projected onto the far wall.

Upon sitting down, it took a moment to realize one of the objects on the table, a little tree and child's swing inside of a bird cage, was actually ticking off the time with tiny jerking movements.

"By forming a critical bridge between the tech and manufacturing centers, [Shapeways' factory]'ll give other companies the idea they need to be here," said Mayor Bloomberg. "It'll also help us bring the city's industrial sector directly into the twenty-first century and it will add to Long Island City's reputation as one of the hottest spots on the planet, where tech companies can grow."

"It is really potentially one of the great transformations in this country, in the world, of how we go from an idea to something that's useful." Though, of course, some of the products on the table veered more in the direction of decorative.

Pointing out that the facility's opening would create fifty manufacturing jobs in its first year alone, the mayor took a moment to trumpet the state of the city's employment statistics: "Today there are 3.8 million jobs in the five boroughs. It is an all-time high record. Last time we were even close to this was 43 years ago." He also noted that, while the city has less than three percent of the country's population, this year it's created nearly eight percent of the private-sector jobs in the country.

"Each of these things we announce, and each of these things you come to, really do add to what's going on in the city," he added. "It's the reason why we are growing and the rest of the country is, sadly, not."

Soon to be full of 3D printers. (Photo: Shapeways' Instagram)

Besides the ribbon-cutting, the mayor had also stopped by to launch a "next top makers" competition. New Yorkers will be able to upload pictures of something they'd like to design--electronics, home decor, whatever--and five projects will be selected by product design experts, with a sixth chosen by public vote. Those six teams will then participate in a "five month design studio" to develop their product, including working with mentors from Shapeways, Adafruit Industries, and Honeybee Robotics.

In September 2013, the most promising business will get a cash prize.

"Yes, the name of these companies--Shapeways, Adafruit Industries and Honeybee Robotics--don't have the same ring as something conventional like Bloomberg LP does, but it's a different world, you guys," he said, sounding a little like Jean-Luc Picard adjusting his cummerbund on the bridge of the Starship Enterprise.

Next up was Shapeways CEO Peter Weijmarshausen. "So what is Shapeways? Shapeways is a platform for anyone to make, buy and sell their own personal products--things you care about." They're already making 100,000 products or more on a monthly basis, and that number is growing quickly, he said.

Several of the 50 industrial-sized 3D printers soon to inhabit the space were already at work in a room just off the main space--"We already, in true startup fashion, are driving this car whilst we're building it." Once everything's up and running, the facility will do production, post-processing (like dying and polishing) and sorting and distribution, right from the Long Island City space.

That means the company can produce between 3 and 5 million products in the space every year--faster, more affordably, and with less damage to the environment.

After the other speakers had said their part--including Queens borough president Helen Marshall, who turned around and extended a personal welcome to Mr. Weijmarshausen and his company--it was time for the actual ribbon-cutting which, like so many of the 3D printed objects on the table, was largely decorative rather than functional. Several Shapeways employees simply took a ribbon and held it up so that Mayor Bloomberg could cut it, using a pair of 3D printed scissors.

But before the crowd parted ways, a quick Q&A offered the mayor a quick chance to--as always--be booster-in-chief for New York City. Achieving utter tech sector dominance, he explained, is largely a matter of attaining critical mass. "People will say, 'Oh, we have no chance of being bigger in technology than Silicon Valley.' That's not true."

"Once you get the critical mass here, I've always thought that New York's value proposition is a better one, because here people that you want, the best and the brightest, also can partake of great cultural institutions and a very diverse community, so that they can practice their religion and have the kind of food that they want, try new things."

That, and there's a hell of a lot more nightlife.

Artist's rendering.

Is there anything 3D printers won't wholly revolutionize? There's the gun trade and illicit narcotics market, there's the fine art of burrito making, and now, Atlantic Cities reports, a USC professor is working on a means of using them to wholly disrupt the construction business. That's right--he proposes that we jettison prefab construction for just straight 3D printing your next home.

These still highly theoretical houses would be constructed/printed in layers, based on a computer program, with features like plumbing built in. Professor Behrokh Khoshnevis estimates that a 25,000-square-foot home could be built in as little as 24 hours. (Well, it's not like the robots are making a daily rate and therefore see any need to drag the process out.)

Here's the TEDx talk where he works through all this:

http://youtu.be/JdbJP8Gxqog

"What we are hoping to generate," he explains, "are dignified, at a fraction of the cost, at a fraction of the time, far more safely, and with architectural flexibility that would be unprecedented." He argues that this is one of the most promising solutions for the world's many slums built of makeshift materials in poor conditions.

If you look up "TED Talk" in Wikipedia, pretty sure this is tossed out as a theoretical example.

That sounds great, but it's also way more likely anyone commercializing this technology would make it into something a lot like a 21st century Levittown for the globe's rising middle class. Sure, they'll be snazzy and whimsically shaped, but they'll be churned out quickly on vast tracts of land--typically called sprawl.

You know where this would be incredibly helpful, though? Colonizing Mars. Quick, someone get Elon Musk on the phone.

The man and his muse

So what does the Apple fan's Apple fan—the New York Times's own David Pogue, the (somewhat controversial) most widely-read technology columnist in the country—have to say about Apple's relationship to Foxconn? Especially given the front page of today's Times, do these sorts of revelations about their manufacturing processes change the way he feels and/or writes about Apple?

We've reached out to David Pogue for comment with those questions. He did not respond, though he did forward our request to New York Times technology editor Damon Darlin, who responded by assuring us over email that "you’ll never get anyone to talk to you if you approach it like that." On Mr. Darlin's insistence, we rephrased the question, and have yet to hear back.

For the moment, it doesn't look likely.

A search for "Foxconn" turns up nothing on his blog. Searches for David Pogue and mentions of the Chinese manufacturer turn up nothing, either.

Mike Daisey—the critically-lauded monologist whose one-man show about these very problems with Apple, The Agony and the Ecstasy of Steve Jobs, which played at New York's Public Theater to critical acclaim last year—actually singled out David Pogue for failing to investigate Apple's practices.

In an interview with The Daily Beast, Mr. Daisey, whose show ran for a number of weeks, and who actually ran an Op-Ed in the Times, was shocked at Mr. Pogue's silence on his show, let alone Foxconn, who he covers for the Times and writes users manuals for.

"David Pogue—I'll call him out—hasn't actually been in to see the show. What I know of David Pogue, David Pogue would travel on his hands and knees, over broken glass, to see anything about the Mac or Steve Jobs, but...he hasn't been here."

Full-Disclosure: I own an iPhone. Reading the Times' piece today—like every other piece about Foxconn out there—gave me further pause about what owning an Apple product (or anything containing any of the products Foxconn manufactures) actually means, and whether or not it's time to start looking into alternatives. Especially as their stock price and revenues continue to soar.

But I don't own one of the largest audiences for personal technology writing out there, and I've been openly critical of Apple's practices and culture in the past. Mr. Pogue's reputation as a nearly unwavering fan of the company's is well-established. The question of whether or not it gives him pause presents itself pretty clearly; what his silence says about the state of how we as a culture talk about technology is a far murkier picture.

On the bright side, at least there's a Google result for it, now.

fkamer@observer.com | @weareyourfek