(Screencap: Twitter)

An anonymous hacker going by the Twitter handle @TylerSec has published a post on PasteBin claiming to have released 33 GB of JSTOR documents via his own leak network, Tyler Leaks. If the documents are in PDF format and are around 50-75 pages each, that's about 22,500 academic papers dumped. The leak comes in response to the death of hacker hero Aaron Swartz who was facing a federal sentence for "stealing" academic papers from JSTOR.

Gawker writer Adrian Chen notes that the leak could be of the same documents released by Wikimedia contributor Greg Maxwell in 2011. "There's a good chance that this Anonymous leak of JSTOR documents is an old dump from last year," he tweeted.

In the Pastebin post, TylerSec claims to have released the "First leak from the Anonymous Tyler Network: 33 GB of the JSTOR files that Aaron Swartz died to bring to the world." He included a link to his Tumblr where users can download software used to access the documents, as well as a link to the documents themselves.

"The people you are after are the people that society depends on: we write songs, we create art, we build, we invent, we feel love and laugh, we will defend our freedom to our last breath," reads the Pastebin post. "Do not fuck with us."

Anonymous has been vocal in avenging Mr. Swartz's death, recently launching an operation called #OpAngel in his memory.

Wikileaks's symbol for the Stratfor email leak

Wikileaks dropped a bomb on Texas-based "global intelligence company" Stratfor late Sunday with "The Global Intelligence Files," a dump of over 5 million hacked emails containing confidential information about Stratfor's informers, psych ops, pay-offs and the methods they use to make the payments. Anonymous has proudly taken credit for the hack via @YourAnonNews:

To clarify to all journalists - YES, #Anonymous gave the STRATFOR emails obtained in the 2011 LulzXmas hack to WikiLeaks. #GIFiles

— Anonymous (@YourAnonNews) February 27, 2012

Considering the confidential nature of Stratfor's business, this may truly be a devastating blow:

Stratfor’s use of insiders for intelligence soon turned into a money-making scheme of questionable legality. The emails show that in 2009 then-Goldman Sachs Managing Director Shea Morenz and Stratfor CEO George Friedman hatched an idea to "utilise the intelligence" it was pulling in from its insider network to start up a captive strategic investment fund. CEO George Friedman explained in a confidential August 2011 document, marked DO NOT SHARE OR DISCUSS : "What StratCap will do is use our Stratfor’s intelligence and analysis to trade in a range of geopolitical instruments, particularly government bonds, currencies and the like". The emails show that in 2011 Goldman Sach’s Morenz invested "substantially" more than $4million and joined Stratfor’s board of directors. Throughout 2011, a complex offshore share structure extending as far as South Africa was erected, designed to make StratCap appear to be legally independent. But, confidentially, Friedman told StratFor staff : "Do not think of StratCap as an outside organisation. It will be integral... It will be useful to you if, for the sake of convenience, you think of it as another aspect of Stratfor and Shea as another executive in Stratfor... we are already working on mock portfolios and trades". StratCap is due to launch in 2012.

The email dump apparently reveals Stratfor-paid moles in the press. Describing Israeli journalist Yossi Melman, employed by the newspaper Haaretz, as "an information mule," Wikileaks states that Mr. Melman "conspired with Guardian journalist David Leigh to secretly, and in violation of WikiLeaks’ contract with the Guardian, move WikiLeaks US diplomatic cables to Israel."

Other media organizations are name-checked in the emails as well, according to Wikileaks's release. Wikileaks states that Stratfor made "secret" arrangements with outlets "from Reuters to the Kiev Post."

"While it is acceptable for journalists to swap information or be paid by other media organisations," writes Wikileaks, "because Stratfor is a private intelligence organisation [...] these relationships are corrupt or corrupting."

The Wikileaks release makes it clear that some of the motivation for dumping the intelligence firm's dirty business into the ether is, for lack of a better word, personal:

The material contains privileged information about the US government’s attacks against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks and Stratfor’s own attempts to subvert WikiLeaks. There are more than 4,000 emails mentioning WikiLeaks or Julian Assange.

A quick review of some of the emails in the early release seemed to confirm many of Wikileaks's introductory claims regarding their content. Review also revealed that an article regarding the "Ground Zero Mosque," written for the New York Observer by Mark Ames in September, 2010 drew the interest of Stratfor staffers, who considered it "very conspiratorial, but interesting."

UPDATE: Stratfor has responded to the leak with a press release. The company refers to the stolen emails as "a deplorable, unfortunate — and illegal — breach of privacy" and addresses the nebulous nature of "stolen" digital data--how it can be easily altered:

Some of the emails may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies; some may be authentic. We will not validate either. Nor will we explain the thinking that went into them. Having had our property stolen, we will not be victimized twice by submitting to questioning about them.

Stratfor's statement goes on to call the release of the emails "a direct attack" and "another attempt to silence and intimidate the company, and one we reject."

More about one of Stratfor's potentially embarrassing internal documents here. Also, Stratfor's Facebook page may not be available much longer, given the tenor of some of the most recent comments.

Unlike the recent Brazzers porn site hack, however, sloppy practices are being blamed for the YouPorn incident, with debug data about users seemingly being stored in a public fashion since 2007.

Because what people think about first and foremost when visiting a porn site is absolutely rock-solid security.

The breached data contains clearly identifiable email addresses that lead to individuals and institutions, such as two instances of someone using a Messiah College email--Messiah is an explicitly Christian institution that promotes "character and Christian faith" in students "in preparation for lives of service." Another series of logins appear to track back to a former student athlete at Alvernia University, which educates students "in the Franciscan tradition." Adults are free to visit legal porn sites, but the institutions in question might have an issue with their names being anywhere near the user database.

On a much more serious note, Naked Security points out that the hacked data can lead to what amounts to identity theft: "if your YouPorn password is now known, hackers might try that same password against your email address, your PayPal account, your Amazon account, and all many of other online resources."