<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Betabeat &#187; google x labs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betabeat.com/tag/google-x-labs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betabeat.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='betabeat.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://betabeat.com/osd.xml" title="Betabeat" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://betabeat.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Someone Call Sarah Connor, Google&#8217;s Brain Machine Learned to Recognize Cats</title>

		<comments>http://betabeat.com/2012/06/someone-call-sarah-connor-googles-machines-learned-to-recognize-cats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:00:16 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://betabeat.com/2012/06/someone-call-sarah-connor-googles-machines-learned-to-recognize-cats/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nitasha Tiku</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betabeat.com/?p=51993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_52026" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 331px"><a href="http://www.ihasaflavor.com/lolcats/im-in-ur-skynet.jpg"><img class=" wp-image-52026 " title="Skynet LOLcat" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/screen-shot-2012-06-26-at-8-06-13-am.png" alt="" width="321" height="257" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(Photo: ihasaflavor.com)</p></div></p>
<p>No big deal or anything. Don't be alarmed. But Google's secretive computer network simulating the human brain has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/technology/in-a-big-network-of-computers-evidence-of-machine-learning.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all">learned to recognize cats</a>. On its own. With no hints from its mortal creators. AH-HA! So <em>this</em> is how Skynet will begin.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/technology/in-a-big-network-of-computers-evidence-of-machine-learning.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all">The project</a>, of course, comes out of Google's clandestine X Labs, the same futuristic outfit responsible for augmented reality on your face and cars that drive themselves. Geeze, they just can't make humans obsolete fast enough, can they?<!--more--></p>
<p>Operation First Lets Start with the Kitties has been several years in the making, reports <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/technology/in-a-big-network-of-computers-evidence-of-machine-learning.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all">John Markoff at <em>The New York Times</em></a>. Scientists built one of the largest "neural networks," mimicking the human brain, by connecting 16,000 computer processors with more than one billion connections. Then, they proceeded to feed it random thumbnails of images from 10 million YouTube videos.</p>
<p>The results in the cat test were about twice as accurate as prior efforts. But what's perhaps more remarkable, is that unlike most commercial vision technology, which has humans "supervise" (scare quotes his!) the process and label features, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/technology/in-a-big-network-of-computers-evidence-of-machine-learning.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all">GOOG gave its brain no help</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Google brain assembled a dreamlike digital image of a cat by employing a hierarchy of memory locations to successively cull out general features after being exposed to millions of images. The scientists said, however, that it appeared they had developed a cybernetic cousin to what takes place in the brain’s visual cortex.</p>
<p>Neuroscientists have discussed the possibility of what they call the “grandmother neuron,” specialized cells in the brain that fire when they are exposed repeatedly or “trained” to recognize a particular face of an individual.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wait, if cats are the first faces the machine learned to the recognize, does that mean they'll be spared . . . or targeted?</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_52026" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 331px"><a href="http://www.ihasaflavor.com/lolcats/im-in-ur-skynet.jpg"><img class=" wp-image-52026 " title="Skynet LOLcat" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/screen-shot-2012-06-26-at-8-06-13-am.png" alt="" width="321" height="257" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(Photo: ihasaflavor.com)</p></div></p>
<p>No big deal or anything. Don't be alarmed. But Google's secretive computer network simulating the human brain has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/technology/in-a-big-network-of-computers-evidence-of-machine-learning.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all">learned to recognize cats</a>. On its own. With no hints from its mortal creators. AH-HA! So <em>this</em> is how Skynet will begin.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/technology/in-a-big-network-of-computers-evidence-of-machine-learning.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all">The project</a>, of course, comes out of Google's clandestine X Labs, the same futuristic outfit responsible for augmented reality on your face and cars that drive themselves. Geeze, they just can't make humans obsolete fast enough, can they?<!--more--></p>
<p>Operation First Lets Start with the Kitties has been several years in the making, reports <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/technology/in-a-big-network-of-computers-evidence-of-machine-learning.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all">John Markoff at <em>The New York Times</em></a>. Scientists built one of the largest "neural networks," mimicking the human brain, by connecting 16,000 computer processors with more than one billion connections. Then, they proceeded to feed it random thumbnails of images from 10 million YouTube videos.</p>
<p>The results in the cat test were about twice as accurate as prior efforts. But what's perhaps more remarkable, is that unlike most commercial vision technology, which has humans "supervise" (scare quotes his!) the process and label features, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/technology/in-a-big-network-of-computers-evidence-of-machine-learning.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all">GOOG gave its brain no help</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Google brain assembled a dreamlike digital image of a cat by employing a hierarchy of memory locations to successively cull out general features after being exposed to millions of images. The scientists said, however, that it appeared they had developed a cybernetic cousin to what takes place in the brain’s visual cortex.</p>
<p>Neuroscientists have discussed the possibility of what they call the “grandmother neuron,” specialized cells in the brain that fire when they are exposed repeatedly or “trained” to recognize a particular face of an individual.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wait, if cats are the first faces the machine learned to the recognize, does that mean they'll be spared . . . or targeted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://betabeat.com/2012/06/someone-call-sarah-connor-googles-machines-learned-to-recognize-cats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/3a428e5c49eee7c95feb75990765f682?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ntikuobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/screen-shot-2012-06-26-at-8-06-13-am.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Skynet LOLcat</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
				
		<title>Google&#8217;s Covert Google X Labs Is Overrun with Robots, Has Designs On Your Future</title>

		<comments>http://betabeat.com/2011/11/googles-covert-google-x-labs-is-overrun-with-robots-has-designs-on-your-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:46:54 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://betabeat.com/2011/11/googles-covert-google-x-labs-is-overrun-with-robots-has-designs-on-your-future/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nitasha Tiku</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betabeat.com/?p=21735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_21747" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 258px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-21747" title="google_future_car" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/google_future_car.jpg?w=248&h=300" alt="" width="248" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Tony Stark would approve.</p></div></p>
<p>If you've never heard of Google X, a secret lair hidden away in some undisclosed Bay Area location, you're in good company. Many Google employees haven't either.</p>
<p>The future-facing lab makes Google's <a href="http://themamabee.com/2009/03/27/management-friday-googles-8020-innovation-model/">80/20 model</a> for fostering innovation sound like child's play. Rather than devoting part of the week to somewhat far-fetched ideas, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/technology/at-google-x-a-top-secret-lab-dreaming-up-the-future.html?ref=technology&amp;pagewanted=all"><em>New York Times</em> reports</a>, Google X is "tackling a list of 100 shoot-for-the-stars ideas."</p>
<p>That "stars" part is somewhat literal. One of the projects its developing is a space elevator, "a longtime fantasy of Google’s founders and other Silicon Valley  entrepreneurs" that images space travel along a cable tied to Earth.<!--more--></p>
<p>In the same vein as Xerox PARC, which at work on the PC back when those words probably sounded as kooky as "space elevator," Google X is chasing big dreams. Some of the ideas, which are still in the conceptual stage, are connecting household objects to the Internet, so that a lightbulb could be turned off remotely as well as a fleet of robots for your home and office.</p>
<p>Some of these ideas are actually monetizable: for example, a version of that lightbulb, synched to Android devices, might be out before the end of the year. It's unclear whether Google's driverless cars emerged out of Google X, but Google is currently considering manufacturing them as well, reports the <em>Times</em>.</p>
<p>In an attempt not to rattle shareholders, Google spokesman Jill Hazelbaker emphasized to the paper that the amount Google spends on these ideas isn't anything to freak out about:</p>
<blockquote><p>“While the possibilities are incredibly exciting, please  do keep in mind that the sums involved are very small by comparison to  the investments we make in our core businesses.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I dunno, guys. Spending on space elevators and a robot working class sounds more sensible to us<a href="http://www.betabeat.com/2011/11/07/google-pages-proves-mark-zuckerberg-was-right/"> than trying beat Facebook at social</a>. Stick to what you're good at.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_21747" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 258px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-21747" title="google_future_car" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/google_future_car.jpg?w=248&h=300" alt="" width="248" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Tony Stark would approve.</p></div></p>
<p>If you've never heard of Google X, a secret lair hidden away in some undisclosed Bay Area location, you're in good company. Many Google employees haven't either.</p>
<p>The future-facing lab makes Google's <a href="http://themamabee.com/2009/03/27/management-friday-googles-8020-innovation-model/">80/20 model</a> for fostering innovation sound like child's play. Rather than devoting part of the week to somewhat far-fetched ideas, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/technology/at-google-x-a-top-secret-lab-dreaming-up-the-future.html?ref=technology&amp;pagewanted=all"><em>New York Times</em> reports</a>, Google X is "tackling a list of 100 shoot-for-the-stars ideas."</p>
<p>That "stars" part is somewhat literal. One of the projects its developing is a space elevator, "a longtime fantasy of Google’s founders and other Silicon Valley  entrepreneurs" that images space travel along a cable tied to Earth.<!--more--></p>
<p>In the same vein as Xerox PARC, which at work on the PC back when those words probably sounded as kooky as "space elevator," Google X is chasing big dreams. Some of the ideas, which are still in the conceptual stage, are connecting household objects to the Internet, so that a lightbulb could be turned off remotely as well as a fleet of robots for your home and office.</p>
<p>Some of these ideas are actually monetizable: for example, a version of that lightbulb, synched to Android devices, might be out before the end of the year. It's unclear whether Google's driverless cars emerged out of Google X, but Google is currently considering manufacturing them as well, reports the <em>Times</em>.</p>
<p>In an attempt not to rattle shareholders, Google spokesman Jill Hazelbaker emphasized to the paper that the amount Google spends on these ideas isn't anything to freak out about:</p>
<blockquote><p>“While the possibilities are incredibly exciting, please  do keep in mind that the sums involved are very small by comparison to  the investments we make in our core businesses.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I dunno, guys. Spending on space elevators and a robot working class sounds more sensible to us<a href="http://www.betabeat.com/2011/11/07/google-pages-proves-mark-zuckerberg-was-right/"> than trying beat Facebook at social</a>. Stick to what you're good at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://betabeat.com/2011/11/googles-covert-google-x-labs-is-overrun-with-robots-has-designs-on-your-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/google_future_car.jpg?w=248&#38;h=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">google_future_car</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
