<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Betabeat &#187; BP Has Nothing Better to Do Than to Rewrite Its Own Wikipedia Entry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betabeat.com/2013/03/bp-has-nothing-better-to-do-than-to-rewrite-its-own-wikipedia-entry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betabeat.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='betabeat.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://betabeat.com/osd.xml" title="Betabeat" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://betabeat.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>BP Has Nothing Better to Do Than to Rewrite Its Own Wikipedia Entry</title>

		<comments>http://betabeat.com/2013/03/bp-has-nothing-better-to-do-than-to-rewrite-its-own-wikipedia-entry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:48:21 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://betabeat.com/2013/03/bp-has-nothing-better-to-do-than-to-rewrite-its-own-wikipedia-entry/</link>
			<dc:creator>Jessica Roy</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betabeat.com/?p=82546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_82547" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/deepwater_horizon_oil_spill_-_may_242c_2010_-_with_locator.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-82547" alt="The oil spill, as seen from space. (Photo: Wikipedia)" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/deepwater_horizon_oil_spill_-_may_242c_2010_-_with_locator.jpg?w=300" width="300" height="230" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The oil spill, as seen from space. (Photo: Wikipedia)</p></div></p>
<p>If you can't clean up all the dirty oil your tankers have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill">dumped</a> into the ocean, what's the next best thing? Cleaning up your Wikipedia page, naturally.</p>
<p><!--more-->CNET <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57575460-93/bp-accused-of-rewriting-environmental-record-on-wikipedia/">reports</a> that Wikipedia editors are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:BP#BP.27s_drafts_as_unpublished_primary_sources">up in arms</a> over a certain user named "Arturo at BP," a BP representative who they estimate has rewritten 44 percent of British Petroleum's Wikipedia page, including sections about the company's environmental record. (As a reminder, this is the company responsible for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster.)</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:BP#BP.27s_drafts_as_unpublished_primary_sources">Writes</a> one Wikipedia editor:</p>
<blockquote><p>I know very little about BP and have no particular interest in it. My concern here is that it's a controversial company (fairly or unfairly) that is being allowed to rewrite the article about itself by proxy, without this being signalled to the reader.</p>
<p>In using BP's drafts, editors are using unpublished <a title="Primary source" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_source">primary source</a> material, and letting it set the tone entirely by slotting it into the article without quotation marks and without attributing it to BP. These drafts give us BP's views of itself, or BP's summary of the secondary sources BP has chosen to highlight.</p></blockquote>
<p>As CNET <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57575460-93/bp-accused-of-rewriting-environmental-record-on-wikipedia/">notes</a>, the company may be attempting to clean up its public online image as it gears up for an April 5th hearing regarding a class action suit brought by individuals and businesses negatively impacted by the 2010 spill. So if you see any lines about BP being voted the number-one company for customer satisfaction, you might want to check another source on that one.</p>
<p>Update: BP provided Betabeat with the following statement.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="LTR">Arturo Silva is a full-time BP employee assigned to the Group’s Corporate Communications team in Houston.</p>
<p dir="LTR">Among his many responsibilities, Silva has been leading our project to openly engage with Wikipedia editors and offer suggestions to improve the accuracy of the BP Wikipedia article.</p>
<p dir="LTR">BP operates within Wikipedia’s guidelines for how company representatives should interact with the site's editors. For nearly a year now, we have been fully transparent, never directly editing any copy and always disclosing that any suggestions we offer to Wikipedia’s editors have come from a BP representative.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_82547" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/deepwater_horizon_oil_spill_-_may_242c_2010_-_with_locator.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-82547" alt="The oil spill, as seen from space. (Photo: Wikipedia)" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/deepwater_horizon_oil_spill_-_may_242c_2010_-_with_locator.jpg?w=300" width="300" height="230" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The oil spill, as seen from space. (Photo: Wikipedia)</p></div></p>
<p>If you can't clean up all the dirty oil your tankers have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill">dumped</a> into the ocean, what's the next best thing? Cleaning up your Wikipedia page, naturally.</p>
<p><!--more-->CNET <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57575460-93/bp-accused-of-rewriting-environmental-record-on-wikipedia/">reports</a> that Wikipedia editors are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:BP#BP.27s_drafts_as_unpublished_primary_sources">up in arms</a> over a certain user named "Arturo at BP," a BP representative who they estimate has rewritten 44 percent of British Petroleum's Wikipedia page, including sections about the company's environmental record. (As a reminder, this is the company responsible for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster.)</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:BP#BP.27s_drafts_as_unpublished_primary_sources">Writes</a> one Wikipedia editor:</p>
<blockquote><p>I know very little about BP and have no particular interest in it. My concern here is that it's a controversial company (fairly or unfairly) that is being allowed to rewrite the article about itself by proxy, without this being signalled to the reader.</p>
<p>In using BP's drafts, editors are using unpublished <a title="Primary source" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_source">primary source</a> material, and letting it set the tone entirely by slotting it into the article without quotation marks and without attributing it to BP. These drafts give us BP's views of itself, or BP's summary of the secondary sources BP has chosen to highlight.</p></blockquote>
<p>As CNET <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57575460-93/bp-accused-of-rewriting-environmental-record-on-wikipedia/">notes</a>, the company may be attempting to clean up its public online image as it gears up for an April 5th hearing regarding a class action suit brought by individuals and businesses negatively impacted by the 2010 spill. So if you see any lines about BP being voted the number-one company for customer satisfaction, you might want to check another source on that one.</p>
<p>Update: BP provided Betabeat with the following statement.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="LTR">Arturo Silva is a full-time BP employee assigned to the Group’s Corporate Communications team in Houston.</p>
<p dir="LTR">Among his many responsibilities, Silva has been leading our project to openly engage with Wikipedia editors and offer suggestions to improve the accuracy of the BP Wikipedia article.</p>
<p dir="LTR">BP operates within Wikipedia’s guidelines for how company representatives should interact with the site's editors. For nearly a year now, we have been fully transparent, never directly editing any copy and always disclosing that any suggestions we offer to Wikipedia’s editors have come from a BP representative.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://betabeat.com/2013/03/bp-has-nothing-better-to-do-than-to-rewrite-its-own-wikipedia-entry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b59d8cbbeb9009e27771e8c6863ee21a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jroyobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/deepwater_horizon_oil_spill_-_may_242c_2010_-_with_locator.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">The oil spill, as seen from space. (Photo: Wikipedia)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
