Identical twins Kirk and Nate Mueller sat side-by-side in identical leather chairs wearing identical GANT gabardine suits fiddling with identical Le Pen pens. It was chilly December afternoon just before the New Year at the Fort Greene offices of Studio Mercury, a boutique design firm made up entirely of alumni from the Rhode Island School of Design’s hyper-exclusive Digital + Media graduate program.
The Muellers’ similarities are more than superficial. The twins, who are 27 and stand 5’5″, share the same bank account. They share the same calendar. They share the same curriculum vitae. The same sexual orientation (gay), brownstone (Prospect Heights) and taste in boyfriends (“over 30”). They share the same profession, and the same specialty (interactive design). They even, in a manner of speaking, share an identity. Email the Brothers Mueller at their shared account, and the only way to tell which Mueller is responding is by whose name shows up first in the signature: Nate & Kirk versus Kirk & Nate.
“We have this little notation,” said Kirk.
“Some people figured it out,” chimed in Nate, who, along with his brother, seems unburdened by matters of selfhood.
One stutters trying to figure out how to address them. “The Brothers, the Brothers Mueller, or ‘the twins,’ or ‘the boys,’” Kirk said.
In the year and a half since the Brothers got their master degrees from RISD—sharing the podium as commencement speakers in 2010—and moved to New York, they have created iPad apps for Martha Stewart and e-books for Vanity Fair and Bon Appetit. Coming soon are a political website for The New Yorker and an iPad app for Newsweek. Whereas most graphic and user-interface designers tend to hand off the technical work, the brothers do it all, relying on Nate’s speed in programming and Kirk’s facility with design.
Their first media world collaboration, a one-off iPad app for Martha Stewart called Boundless Beauty, won the Society of Publication Designers “Tablet App of the Year” award. Shortly after, Time magazine called it the cover of the year for featuring an interactive time-lapse video of one of Martha’s prize peonies, a 10-hour shoot compressed into 10 seconds. The SPD Award dinner was on a Friday. (“We have these crushed velvet pumps,” said Nate. “Loafers,” Kirk corrected. “And it’s the only time you could wear something like that,” Nate finished.) The following Monday, they got a call from Scott Dadich, Condé Nast’s vice president of digital magazine development, about revamping the company’s e-book operation.
“At this point in media, they have a bit of a lore, like, ‘Oh, the Mueller Brothers are coming!” said Melissa Lafsky, the launch editor for Newsweek’s updated iPad edition, which is slated to debut on Jan. 23, with the Brothers’ help. “When they come into the office, people love it because they’re so striking to look at. Everyone does a double-take because they’re so handsome and well-dressed and there are two of them. They’re a presence. They’re sort of the modern Jewish mother’s dream.”
“When Martha met them, her first question was whether they would appear on The Martha Stewart Show,” seconded Gael Towey, longtime chief creative and editorial director for Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia.
Not everything about the duo is as identical as it first appears, however. After the first half hour, it comes into focus that Nate’s face is more of an oval. The bridge of Kirk’s nose is more narrow, his physique more slight. Nate’s voice is deeper and a few decibels more nasal—a blessed discovery you don’t make until the next day. “It’ll be hard to transcribe,” they warned, eyeing The Observer’s digital recorder.
“Our collective identity is what matters,” said Kirk.
“We don’t get offended if people can’t tell us apart,” added Nate.
“Gilbert and George, the art duo, they call themselves ‘living sculptures.’ We like the idea of instead of being ‘living decorative objects,’” explained Kirk, gamely.
Before speaking, the twins tend to turn, birdlike, to face each other, often hesitating until they’ve reached some sort of wordless consensus before offering a response.
For all their attention-getting ensembles, the brothers retain a Midwestern equanimity from a youth spent in the suburbs of Akron. “Because we were originally raised Catholic, we have this running joke that for these twin gay boys in Akron, Ohio, our outlet to ornamentation and beautiful things was going to Mass,” said Kirk, recalling that as altar boys they fought over who got to wear the gold sash.
As budding young artists, they read up on the Aesthetics Movement and admired Oscar Wilde and Quentin Crisp.
They came out at different times—Nate first, Kirk years later, but never officially to each other. “I guess we always assumed that the other one was going through the same things,” they wrote in an email. “We would have been more surprised to find out the other one was straight.”
Even among unflappable New Yorkers, the Brothers Mueller tend to draw stares. In the subway or the elevator at 4 Times Square, “we get stopped once a week by people who say, ‘Have you been interviewed for a magazine or newspaper?’ and we just go, ‘Nooo,’” Kirk said, demurely shaking his head.
“That’s what’s fun. They see you maybe as objects? So we get people touching us,” said Nate, miming a hand on his arm, “saying, ‘Do you know that you’re twins?!’ It’s great.”
Indeed, the brothers are just as affable fielding questions about their interactive wallpaper, which was on exhibit at the Chelsea Art Museum and featured stylized versions of a viral molecule, appearing and disappearing between delicate rows of damask (“They’re STD viruses!” explained Kirk), as they are entertaining questions about fetish play.
Identical twins tend to receive unsolicited queries of a sexual nature, and in 2010, when Bel Ami, the gay porn production company, introduced the world to the Peters twins, muscle-bound teenage Czechs who begat the word “twincest,” such interrogations took a turn for the lurid.
“It used to upset us a little at first,” Kirk said. “But now we’re very playful with it.”
“My favorite is using ambiguous language,” Nate added.
“They’ll ask questions about us, like do we date the same guy or do you sleep with the same guy,” explained Kirk. “So we’ll purposefully answer, like, ‘Not usually,’ or ‘I don’t know,’ at the same time. Nate will say, ‘Not really,’ and I’ll say, ‘I don’t know.’ It’ll explode their head.”
“And then we walk away,” finished Nate.
Later, they offered a less ambiguous answer by email: “We don’t think there is a need to experiment with something like that when there’s a whole city full of beautiful people.”
As for whether they would date the same man simultaneously, however, they added dryly, “I think it’s the German in us that seeks out efficiency, so what would be more efficient than the both of us dating one person?”
They are like the Binars from Star Trek.
boring
Nate & Kirk are great guys doing great things. I can’t wait to see what they do next.
My friend was working on apple and he changed his profession and life build career because he discovered the best method to get a ipad for free. Each problem which I have with iPad it’s finished for me because my friend Mike helps me.
After he told me the best method to get a free iPad 2, it always helps me with all sorts of questions I have. This is his job and I appreciate very much his website free-us-ipad.com .
I hope that he will help you with your all questions. It is an amazing man. All my family got free ipads 2 + white smartcover. It’s a user proof category there if you don`t believe me. This man is my idol
I’m a twin in my 40′s and this is outright creepy!!!
While I commend their design talents, being so co-dependent on the “identity of being a twin” is narcissistic at best. Tethering their talents to biology means neither is confident enough to stand on their own and have used TWIN as a new branding identity in a era where mass consumerism and duplication is more important than individuality.
I was born in an era where fertility drugs were not common so it was less common to see twins in the late 1960′s. I also had parents who insisted that we not be dressed alike and that we were each referred by our given names rather than “the twins”: we were two people and therefore should be treated as such.
These guys are living in a suspended state of existence that is bound by their own self imposed paradox: dilute their own identity by amplifying the identity as “twin”, half of something else.
My sister and I prefer not to be identified solely as “twins” and have both gone on to formulate unique individual identities which are far more rewarding than being stuck in the bondage of biological similarities which (usually) translates into a visual oddity to others.
We also do not like the attention it brings when we are in public and have a more reserved approach about being twins. We refer to each other as “sister”, letting people find out we are twins in time rather than shoving it in their face to make us seem more important. We have many similarities especially when it comes to design abilities and creative thinking, but there is no reason for either of us to manipulate the public into thinking we are “better” just because we are twins.
The branding (which is borderline incestuous) may fool others, but it is incredibly creepy to someone who is a twin and can stand on their own without being propped up by her twin sister.
Shame on the people who fell for this non-sense, especially the ONE RESUME. I’m going to send my sister’s resume to the person who fell for this and see if get a job.
Please, sir, let’s not judge. How often do you see something this interesting. Casting negative aspersions upon the choices and lifestyles of others (provided they are not harming anyone) is what is arguably creepy. But you are probably a good person, too, I won’t judge you. But if you can swing it with them, I’m “over 30″ and I’d like to date both of them together
While I agree about twins having individual identities, I’ve witnessed first hand (brothers) ties that bind. But lighten up! It’s marketing, baby, marketing, whatever one may think of that in this marketable age….
I happen to be a friend of the father of these two guys and you could not be more off in your comments.
Please lighten up! These are good kids doing fantastic things and the use of their “twinhood” is pure marketing….oh and it works!
These twins were born out of two Parents who were young and in love. Parents are long time neighborhood friends of the early 80′s.
I think they Twins are smart, talented, in fact geniuses! Why are people enraged because they choose to have one resume? What does it matter, whom does it harm if they want to be known as one? Evidently they work together fabulously so get a life. So they are alittle eccentric – again who cares? They are hard workers and do great work, I can’t wait to see what they come up with next!! A HUGE fan!
How disgusting. “We like the idea of instead of being ‘living decorative objects’ ” – I can’t even imagine. They’re nothing but two gay hipsters with twee sensibilities and an iPad app for Martha Stewart, of all people. Barely more downtown than an UO. Does RISD really need this type of ‘Project Runway’ publicity?
Gilbert and George, indeed. And as for the twincest digression, I suppose you can take the silly bottoms out of Ohio, but…
you love them.
These two spoke at my RISD commencement and I was blown away! These guys are funny, intelligent, and very captivating.
For those judging from the outside, please take a step back. The article is meant to be funny and inspire curiosity, not rude and hasty comments. No need to get aggressive. Obviously you don’t have an open and creative mind.
A practical joke or prank differs from a spoken one in that the major
component of the humour is physical rather than verbal.also see jose
joke teller
Jose joke teller is best. I like this. Thanks for sharing.
Yes, I am agree with all of you. It is the best.