<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Betabeat &#187; Supreme Court Argues Letting Cops Track Cars With GPS Will Send Us All Into 1984</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betabeat.com/2011/11/supreme-court-argues-letting-cops-track-cars-with-gps-will-send-us-all-into-1984/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betabeat.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='betabeat.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://betabeat.com/osd.xml" title="Betabeat" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://betabeat.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Supreme Court Argues Letting Cops Track Cars With GPS Will Send Us All Into 1984</title>

		<comments>http://betabeat.com/2011/11/supreme-court-argues-letting-cops-track-cars-with-gps-will-send-us-all-into-1984/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:42:09 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://betabeat.com/2011/11/supreme-court-argues-letting-cops-track-cars-with-gps-will-send-us-all-into-1984/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nitasha Tiku</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betabeat.com/?p=21421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_21425" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://thedailybell.com/1596/Justice-Breyer-Argues-for-Activism.html"><img class="size-full wp-image-21425 " title="Justices Breyer And Scalia Testify At House Hearing" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/stephen-breyer.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Justice Breyer</p></div></p>
<p>The Supreme Court's attempts to reconcile the principles of the Constitution with modern-day technology the founding fathers would likely have found unfathomable has led to some <a href="http://boingboing.net/2010/04/21/supreme-court-justic.html">laughable arguments</a> in the past. But this one took a turn for the paranoiac—perhaps rightfully so.</p>
<p>The court has yet to decide on the case of Antoine Jones, a nightclub owner in Washington who was sentenced to life in prison for conspiring to sell cocaine. The evidence for his conviction was a GPS device police placed in his Jeep Grand Cherokee without the proper warrant to track his movements for a month. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. circuit overturned the conviction claiming the amount of information collected violated Fourth Amendment rights protecting unlawful search and seizure.<!--more--></p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/09/us/supreme-court-casts-a-wary-eye-on-tracking-by-gps.html?ref=technology"><em>The New York Times</em></a> points out, the arguments in favor of allowing tracking were rather extremist:</p>
<blockquote><p>"But Michael R. Dreeben, a deputy United States solicitor general, said  there were no constitutional limits to the government’s ability to track  people’s movements in public. He said a device surreptitiously attached  to clothing would be permissible so long as it did not convey  information from inside a home. He added that the police could track the  movements of the justices’ cars without a warrant."</p></blockquote>
<p>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg paraphrased the government's argument thusly: “an electronic device,  as long as it’s not used inside the house, is O.K.”</p>
<p>Mr. Dreeben allowed for the possibility that different statutes might apply to cars, but it was enough to send Justice Stephen Breyer back to high school English.</p>
<blockquote><p>That means, Justice Stephen G. Breyer told Mr. Dreeben, that “if you win  this case, then there is nothing to prevent the police or the  government from monitoring 24 hours a day the public movement of every  citizen of the United States.” And that, Justice Breyer said, “sounds  like ‘1984.’ ”</p></blockquote>
<p>The other justices took the opportunity to pile on the Big Brother scenarios:</p>
<blockquote><p>Justice Sonia Sotomayor indicated that the scenario might have  already arrived. “It wouldn’t take that much of a budget, local budget,  to place a GPS on every car in the nation,” she said.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OlCVNn9ZeY">Dun-dun!</a> Okay, everyone get off the internet and go check your glove compartments.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_21425" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://thedailybell.com/1596/Justice-Breyer-Argues-for-Activism.html"><img class="size-full wp-image-21425 " title="Justices Breyer And Scalia Testify At House Hearing" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/stephen-breyer.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Justice Breyer</p></div></p>
<p>The Supreme Court's attempts to reconcile the principles of the Constitution with modern-day technology the founding fathers would likely have found unfathomable has led to some <a href="http://boingboing.net/2010/04/21/supreme-court-justic.html">laughable arguments</a> in the past. But this one took a turn for the paranoiac—perhaps rightfully so.</p>
<p>The court has yet to decide on the case of Antoine Jones, a nightclub owner in Washington who was sentenced to life in prison for conspiring to sell cocaine. The evidence for his conviction was a GPS device police placed in his Jeep Grand Cherokee without the proper warrant to track his movements for a month. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. circuit overturned the conviction claiming the amount of information collected violated Fourth Amendment rights protecting unlawful search and seizure.<!--more--></p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/09/us/supreme-court-casts-a-wary-eye-on-tracking-by-gps.html?ref=technology"><em>The New York Times</em></a> points out, the arguments in favor of allowing tracking were rather extremist:</p>
<blockquote><p>"But Michael R. Dreeben, a deputy United States solicitor general, said  there were no constitutional limits to the government’s ability to track  people’s movements in public. He said a device surreptitiously attached  to clothing would be permissible so long as it did not convey  information from inside a home. He added that the police could track the  movements of the justices’ cars without a warrant."</p></blockquote>
<p>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg paraphrased the government's argument thusly: “an electronic device,  as long as it’s not used inside the house, is O.K.”</p>
<p>Mr. Dreeben allowed for the possibility that different statutes might apply to cars, but it was enough to send Justice Stephen Breyer back to high school English.</p>
<blockquote><p>That means, Justice Stephen G. Breyer told Mr. Dreeben, that “if you win  this case, then there is nothing to prevent the police or the  government from monitoring 24 hours a day the public movement of every  citizen of the United States.” And that, Justice Breyer said, “sounds  like ‘1984.’ ”</p></blockquote>
<p>The other justices took the opportunity to pile on the Big Brother scenarios:</p>
<blockquote><p>Justice Sonia Sotomayor indicated that the scenario might have  already arrived. “It wouldn’t take that much of a budget, local budget,  to place a GPS on every car in the nation,” she said.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OlCVNn9ZeY">Dun-dun!</a> Okay, everyone get off the internet and go check your glove compartments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://betabeat.com/2011/11/supreme-court-argues-letting-cops-track-cars-with-gps-will-send-us-all-into-1984/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/stephen-breyer.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Justices Breyer And Scalia Testify At House Hearing</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
