<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Betabeat &#187; Wherefore Art Thou, Eric Schmidt of Yore? </title>
	<atom:link href="http://betabeat.com/2011/09/wherefore-art-thou-eric-schmidt-of-yore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betabeat.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:21:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='betabeat.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://betabeat.com/osd.xml" title="Betabeat" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://betabeat.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Wherefore Art Thou, Eric Schmidt of Yore?</title>

		<comments>http://betabeat.com/2011/09/wherefore-art-thou-eric-schmidt-of-yore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:44:58 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://betabeat.com/2011/09/wherefore-art-thou-eric-schmidt-of-yore/</link>
			<dc:creator>Nitasha Tiku</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betabeat.com/?p=17612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_17616" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-17616" title="schmidt" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/schmidt.jpg?w=300&h=162" alt="" width="300" height="162" /><p class="wp-caption-text">via Reuters</p></div></p>
<p>Eric Schmidt made his much-anticipated appearance in Washington D.C. yesterday for the Senate antitrust hearings on Google. Sadly, it was not the show Betabeat was hoping for.</p>
<p>Not only did Congress <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110921/14190816043/how-quickly-we-forget-googles-competitors-falsely-claim-google-dominates-because-it-was-first.shtml">fail to familiarize itself with how the internet works</a> <em>and</em> seem confused as to whether they wanted to chastize Google or <a href="http://gigaom.com/2011/09/21/congress-doesnt-get-google-it-doesnt-get-congress/">beseech it</a> to bring broadband to their home states. But Mr. Schmidt, who could always be counted on for a wry/terrifying turn-of-phrase during his tenure as CEO, seemed to have been coached into submission.</p>
<p>He did, however manage to sneak in a few quips into his prepared remarks.<!--more--></p>
<p>First with his opening words, "Good afternoon Chairman Kohl, Ranking Member Lee, and Members of the subcommittee. Thank you for inviting me here today." That's more read-between-the-lines funny than funny haha as Mr. Schmidt's reluctant RSVP was <a href="http://www.betabeat.com/2011/06/24/five-reasons-eric-schmidt-should-testify-in-the-antitrust-probe-against-google/">under threat of subpoena</a>. The part where he condescended to Congress like he was Mark Zuckerberg and they were the Ad Board was also mildly amusing, "We get it," said Mr. Schmidt. "By that I mean that we get the lessons of our corporate predecessors. We also get that it's natural for you to have questions about our business." <em>As natural as a child asking its parents why the sky is blue. </em></p>
<p>But the real disappointment came during the question and answer part of the hearing when Senator Herb Kohl, a Democrat from Wisconsin who chairs the Senate antitrust panel, asked him, point blank, whether Google was a monopoly. As <a href="I would agree, sir, that we’re in that area....I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding of monopoly findings is this is a judicial process.  Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/is-google-a-monopoly-were-in-that-area-admits-schmidt-2011-9?op=1#ixzz1YhDdPxTU">Business Insider</a> reports, Sen. Kohl asked:</p>
<blockquote><p>But  you do recognize that in the words that are used and antitrust kind of  oversight, your market share constitutes monopoly, dominant -- special  power dominant for a monopoly firm. You recognize you're in that area?</p></blockquote>
<p>The suddenly press-appropriate Mr. Schmidt responded:</p>
<blockquote><p>I  would agree, sir, that we’re in that area....I'm not a lawyer, but my  understanding of monopoly findings is this is a judicial process.</p></blockquote>
<div>Thankfully, we already know what the old, more candid Mr. Schmidt would have said because he's said it before: "<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/10/googles-ceo-the-laws-are-written-by-lobbyists/63908/">Google policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it</a>."</div>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_17616" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-17616" title="schmidt" src="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/schmidt.jpg?w=300&h=162" alt="" width="300" height="162" /><p class="wp-caption-text">via Reuters</p></div></p>
<p>Eric Schmidt made his much-anticipated appearance in Washington D.C. yesterday for the Senate antitrust hearings on Google. Sadly, it was not the show Betabeat was hoping for.</p>
<p>Not only did Congress <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110921/14190816043/how-quickly-we-forget-googles-competitors-falsely-claim-google-dominates-because-it-was-first.shtml">fail to familiarize itself with how the internet works</a> <em>and</em> seem confused as to whether they wanted to chastize Google or <a href="http://gigaom.com/2011/09/21/congress-doesnt-get-google-it-doesnt-get-congress/">beseech it</a> to bring broadband to their home states. But Mr. Schmidt, who could always be counted on for a wry/terrifying turn-of-phrase during his tenure as CEO, seemed to have been coached into submission.</p>
<p>He did, however manage to sneak in a few quips into his prepared remarks.<!--more--></p>
<p>First with his opening words, "Good afternoon Chairman Kohl, Ranking Member Lee, and Members of the subcommittee. Thank you for inviting me here today." That's more read-between-the-lines funny than funny haha as Mr. Schmidt's reluctant RSVP was <a href="http://www.betabeat.com/2011/06/24/five-reasons-eric-schmidt-should-testify-in-the-antitrust-probe-against-google/">under threat of subpoena</a>. The part where he condescended to Congress like he was Mark Zuckerberg and they were the Ad Board was also mildly amusing, "We get it," said Mr. Schmidt. "By that I mean that we get the lessons of our corporate predecessors. We also get that it's natural for you to have questions about our business." <em>As natural as a child asking its parents why the sky is blue. </em></p>
<p>But the real disappointment came during the question and answer part of the hearing when Senator Herb Kohl, a Democrat from Wisconsin who chairs the Senate antitrust panel, asked him, point blank, whether Google was a monopoly. As <a href="I would agree, sir, that we’re in that area....I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding of monopoly findings is this is a judicial process.  Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/is-google-a-monopoly-were-in-that-area-admits-schmidt-2011-9?op=1#ixzz1YhDdPxTU">Business Insider</a> reports, Sen. Kohl asked:</p>
<blockquote><p>But  you do recognize that in the words that are used and antitrust kind of  oversight, your market share constitutes monopoly, dominant -- special  power dominant for a monopoly firm. You recognize you're in that area?</p></blockquote>
<p>The suddenly press-appropriate Mr. Schmidt responded:</p>
<blockquote><p>I  would agree, sir, that we’re in that area....I'm not a lawyer, but my  understanding of monopoly findings is this is a judicial process.</p></blockquote>
<div>Thankfully, we already know what the old, more candid Mr. Schmidt would have said because he's said it before: "<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/10/googles-ceo-the-laws-are-written-by-lobbyists/63908/">Google policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it</a>."</div>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://betabeat.com/2011/09/wherefore-art-thou-eric-schmidt-of-yore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/becf95fa833b8aeb13f7720732bd6dc6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jhanasobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyobetabeat.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/schmidt.jpg?w=300&#38;h=162" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">schmidt</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
